On Tue, 08 May 2012 15:14:47 +0200 Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote:
> On 08/05/2012 14:06, David Jander wrote: > > >> Go ahead in this direction. Then we can test on these boards (mx51evk / > >> vision2 / efikamx), the only ones having these issue). > > > > I agree we should only change the headers, but... if there are more i.MX51 > > boards, they may all potentially need to fix their board code.... and that > > is > > up to them. Unfortunately this warning/wake-up call should come from > > Freescale > > themselves, but I have not heared anything from them. > > What we can do is to change all MX51 boards in mainline (the three > boards we have already mentioned), explaining in the commit-id of the > patch why we change. We do not care about boards that were not pushed to > mainline. Seems reasonable. Are you also implying that you are willing to propose a patch? (Swapping the two values seems fairly trivial....) Best regards, -- David Jander Protonic Holland. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
