Hi Scott, On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: > On 04/13/2012 01:45 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Scott, >> >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote: >>> On 04/13/2012 01:25 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>>>>>> Has this binding been accepted into Linux's documentation or another >>>>>>> canonical source? >>>>>> >>>>>> No >>>>> >>>>> It would be good to get that settled first. I assume you'll want to use >>>>> this binding with Linux eventually. >>>> >>>> I am not sure - from what I hear Linux does ID lookup instead - but >>>> really this binding is only useful without ONFI support I suspect. >>> >>> I'm not sure what difference you're seeing between U-Boot and Linux. >>> Both U-Boot and Linux uses the ID table in the absence of ONFI. >> >> I don't think this driver supports ONFI. I haven't tried it though. > > But even in the absence of ONFI, what is the difference? Both Linux and > U-Boot use the ID table. If you need this stuff in U-boot you'll need > it in Linux.
Quite possibly, but without a Linux driver it is hard to compare. > > -Scott > Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
