Dear Andreas, In message <4f82835f.2030...@googlemail.com> you wrote: > > > Where are these odd sizes like > > > >> #define CONFIG_ENV_SIZE 0x4200 > > > > coming from? Has a size of 0x4200 any special maning on these > > systems? > > please read Ulfs mail: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/123862/focus=125897
Thanks for the pointer. > I think it is OK to apply this patch. I did not intend to object against this patch; I just wonered about the odd numbers, > I think another point is that these Atmel devices became less important > than before in U-Boot (I see not really much users here even though a > lot of people use it): > a) a lot of users favor the at91bootstrap SPL to boot linux (no need > for u-boot) This could probably be changed if they were converted to using U-Boot's SPL mechanism instead - but then, I also realize that there is only very low interest for them. > b) they have well-hung cores Indeed. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." - Bert Lantz _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
