On Sunday 01 April 2012 20:25:44 Graeme Russ wrote: > b) The code calling malloc(0) is making a perfectly legitimate assumption > based on how glibc handles malloc(0)
not really. POSIX says malloc(0) is implementation defined (so it may return a unique address, or it may return NULL). no userspace code assuming malloc(0) will return non-NULL is correct. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
