Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote on 2012/04/01 16:01:56: > > Dear Joakim Tjernlund, > > > > Dear Mike Frysinger, > > > > > > > On Thursday, October 21, 2010 17:10:31 Graeme Russ wrote: > > > > > On 22/10/10 06:51, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > > > have u-boot return an error. > > > > > > > > > > Is NULL what you consider to be an error > > > > > > > > yes > > > > > > > > > Besides, is not free(NULL) valid (does nothing) as well? > > > > > > > > yes, free(NULL) should work fine per POSIX > > > > -mike > > > > > > Well then, this patch wasn't accepted yet and I consider it OK to apply. > > > Any objections? > > > > There was a long debate on the list regarding this where I argued that > > malloc(0) should not be an error and malloc should return a ptr != NULL > > I guess that is why it hasn't been applied. > > > > Jocke > > Ok, let's restart. Is there any objection why malloc(0) should not return NULL > in uboot?
Yes, read the thread to see why. > Is it coliding with any spec? No, both are valid. Jocke _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
