On Mar 26, 2012, at 12:30 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > Hi Graeme, > > On 22.03.2012 04:58, Graeme Russ wrote: >> Hello Custodians and Mailing List Aficionados, >> >> I don't know if anyone has noticed, but patchwork is starting to collect >> a rather large amount of cruft. >> >> I occasionally jump onto patchwork and do a little housekeeping by marking >> updated patches as 'Superceeded' and anything applied by Wolfgang as >> 'Accepted' (There may be a few patches that have been applied to custodian >> tress that I marked as 'Accepted' when really they should have been marked >> as 'Awaiting Upstream') >> >> I really don't mind doing this housekeeping, but I would like to make a >> few suggestions that will make the work a little easier: >> >> - If you are a custodian: >> o When you apply a patch to your repo, can you please assign it to >> yourself in patchwork and set it to 'Awaiting Upstream' >> o Reply to the ML with 'Applied to<repo>/<branch>' >> o When you send a pull request, create a bundle with all the patches >> that are to be pulled (you can create the bundle early and add >> patches as you apply them) >> o When Wolfgang pulls your repo, go to the bundle and mark all the >> patches 'Accepted' >> >> - If you are a patch submitter: >> o Visit http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/ >> o Search for your patches by following the 'Filters'link and entering >> your name >> o Send and email (with 'patchwork' somewhere in the subject) to the ML >> with a list of patches that you submitted say more than one month > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/135526/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/135699/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/135697/ > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/135698/ > > That's the list of patches sent in January, still no progress. > >> ago. For each patch, please indicate if the patch is: >> * Superseded - By another patch (either by you or someone else) >> * Not Applicable - The patch can be ignored (was an RFC, was due >> to a misunderstanding, another patch did the same thing, etc) >> * Applied - Has been applied (state the repo and branch) >> * Rejected - Patch has been officially rejected >> * Waiting - You believe the patch is still valid but has not been >> applied (send a ping as a reply to the patch on the mailing list >> as well > I marked the patches as `awaiting upstream'.
Awaiting upstream means that the patches have been applied already, and are waiting for Wolfgang's pull. I suspect this is not the case for your patches. If it is the case, then there's probably no need to mention it, as Wolfgang will eventually pull that tree. Andy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
