Dear Stefano Babic, > On 26/03/2012 00:11, Eric Nelson wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > Hi Eric, > > > Have you had a chance to review this V4 patch for the fec_mxc driver? > > > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/120205.html > > Marek has sent all cache relevant patches together in the same patchset. > If I am not wrong, your V4 was sent as :
That's true ... also, I'm afraid the arm926ejs stuff won't be Acked by AA since he's gone ... somewhere, noone knows where :-( > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/147143/ > > and he added his own Ack. > > > Note that Stefano pointed out yesterday that PPC doesn't properly > > implement "invalidate_dcache_range". > > > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-March/120918.html > > > > I believe you mentioned previously that the fec_mxc driver was > > compatible with certain PPC SOCs, so this might temporarily block > > any such transition. > > For FEC it is easier as for ESDHC. The controller on PowerPC has the > same name, but it is different - and there is a different driver. The > fec_mxc.c is only for i.MX SOCs, and we are sure we do not break other > architectures, except i.MX. I know it breaks MX3x, I will check it. > > The whole serie depends on the first patch: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/147135/ > > This must be acked / merged by Albert, because it is for all arm926 SOCs. > > Best regards, > Stefano Babic Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
