> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com]
> Sent: 22 March 2012 13:28
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp; Gerlando Falauto
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions
> board_spi_bus_claim/release
> 
> Hi Prafulla,
> 
> On 03/21/2012 05:30 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote:
> >> Subject: [PATCH 10/21] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions
> >> board_spi_bus_claim/release
> >>
> >> From: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com>
> >>
> >> Some kirkwood based boards may need to implement such function due
> to
> >> some HW designs.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com>
> >> cc: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.fala...@keymile.com>
> >> cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com>
> >> cc: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > Pls post this as standalone patch, does not have any dependency.
> > Exclude from this patch series.
> >
> 
> hm, without this patch this patchserie will end up in boards wich are
> not able
> to work properly. So for me there is a dependancy. But if you still
> insist...

You may mention this as dependency, you can always test your board by applying 
this patch, whereas this is specific to SPI and I think should go separately 
(may be through other custodian).

Regards..
Prafulla . . .
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to