> -----Original Message----- > From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com] > Sent: 22 March 2012 13:28 > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Valentin Longchamp; Gerlando Falauto > Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/21] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions > board_spi_bus_claim/release > > Hi Prafulla, > > On 03/21/2012 05:30 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > >> Subject: [PATCH 10/21] spi/kirkwood: add weak functions > >> board_spi_bus_claim/release > >> > >> From: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> > >> > >> Some kirkwood based boards may need to implement such function due > to > >> some HW designs. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Valentin Longchamp <valentin.longch...@keymile.com> > >> cc: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.fala...@keymile.com> > >> cc: Prafulla Wadaskar <prafu...@marvell.com> > >> cc: Holger Brunck <holger.bru...@keymile.com> > >> --- > > > > Pls post this as standalone patch, does not have any dependency. > > Exclude from this patch series. > > > > hm, without this patch this patchserie will end up in boards wich are > not able > to work properly. So for me there is a dependancy. But if you still > insist...
You may mention this as dependency, you can always test your board by applying this patch, whereas this is specific to SPI and I think should go separately (may be through other custodian). Regards.. Prafulla . . . _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot