Hi Stephen, On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 03/08/2012 11:39 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Stephen Warren, >> >> In message <4f58f5b8.6070...@wwwdotorg.org> you wrote: >>> >>> I noticed this patch isn't applied yet that I can find. Are there any >>> comments on it; can it be applied? Thanks. >>> >>> For reference, it's in patchwork at: >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/134712/ > ... >>>> diff --git a/drivers/serial/ns16550.c b/drivers/serial/ns16550.c >>>> @@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ void NS16550_init(NS16550_t com_port, int baud_divisor) >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_TEGRA2) >>>> + /* >>>> + * Put a 'D' in the scratchpad to let the kernel know which UART >>>> + * for earlyprintk [D]ebugging. >>>> + */ >>>> + serial_out('D', &com_port->spr); >>>> +#endif >> >> I don't like to see such highly architecture specific stuff in common >> code, especially if it's such a dirty hack like this. > > Would it help if we moved the this code to some Tegra-specific file > rather than the common serial port driver?
Could it be done as the last thig before jumping into the Linux kernel in arch_preboot_os() Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
