On Thursday 08 March 2012 01:39:53 Simon Glass wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 March 2012 01:24:21 Simon Glass wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > On Thursday 16 February 2012 09:48:58 Simon Glass wrote: > >> >> --- a/board/cm4008/flash.c > >> >> +++ b/board/cm4008/flash.c > >> >> > >> >> #include <common.h> > >> >> +#include <asm-generic/sections.h> > >> > > >> > arches should provide asm/sections.h, and those are the only headers > >> > that should know about asm-generic/sections.h > >> > >> Similar to my previous comment, but why does each arch have to have > >> subtly-different section symbol names? From what I have seen so far > >> there can be unified also. > > > > Blackfin has linker symbols that don't belong in any other port. this is > > also how the kernel does it, and i don't see value in diverging here. > > OK, so I think I should update the sections.h patch to add > asm/sections.h for every arch, initially just with an include to > asm-generic/sections.h in each one? Does that sound right?
yep. unless we want to get really ambitious and extend the generated support like the kernel has now -- it automatically generates sub headers for asm/ redirects to asm-generic/ if the arch hasn't provided one. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
