On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 09:04:41PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2012 20:46:40 Graeme Russ wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Monday 05 March 2012 19:15:54 Marek Vasut wrote: > > >> Acked-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> > > >> > > >> Thanks for your patch, it's on it's way to application :) > > > > > > generally the maintainer who is picking up the patch and sending on to > > > wolfgang would add a s-o-b rather than a-b tag ... > > > > I've always seen s-o-b as 'I contributed to this patch' and a-b as 'I > > think this patch looks good (and I may have even compiled it)' and t-b as > > 'I actually ran this on real hardware' > > the Linux kernel wisdom is "s-o-b means 'i handled this patch in transit to > merge'" while "a-b means 'looks good to me'"
But didn't we have this discussion a few months ago and the answer was that U-Boot isn't the kernel and custodians don't S-O-B every patch they add, just A-B/T-B (and then it's at their discretion). -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
