> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 January 2012 15:27:58 Pali Rohár wrote: > >> * Hide function save_boot_params if CONFIG_SPL_BUILD is not defined > >> (function do nothing) > >> > >> * Same behaviour as in file arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/lowlevel_init.S > >> * This allow to implement board specified function save_boot_params in > >> board code > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> Changes since original version: > >> - Fixed commit message > >> > >> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/lowlevel_init.S | 4 ++-- > >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/lowlevel_init.S > >> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/lowlevel_init.S index 2f6930b..c42c5dd 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/lowlevel_init.S > >> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/lowlevel_init.S > >> @@ -35,15 +35,15 @@ > >> _TEXT_BASE: > >> .word CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE /* sdram load addr from config.mk > >> */ > >> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > >> .global save_boot_params > >> save_boot_params: > >> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD > >> ldr r4, =omap3_boot_device > >> ldr r5, [r0, #0x4] > >> and r5, r5, #0xff > >> str r5, [r4] > >> -#endif > >> bx lr > >> +#endif > >> > >> .global omap3_gp_romcode_call > > > >> omap3_gp_romcode_call: > > Now I see that somebody commited this patch to u-boot: > > http://git.denx.de/?p=u- > > boot.git;a=commit;h=204705111ca10f52f62e1a02ba567d8fc33a6d1e > > > > So I will not include it in new version. > > > > Please, can you inform me when somebody commit my patches to git master? > > I did: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/137559/ :)
Do we really want this hack-around? Maybe generating such bootargs by uboot in the first place (or the ability to actually source bootargs and adjust env accordingly) won't be too bad of a solution? M _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
