On Wednesday 15 February 2012 01:26:10 Simon Glass wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 23 January 2012 00:30:32 Simon Glass wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:46 Simon Glass wrote:
> > > >> +#define CONFIG_LMB
> > > > 
> > > > do we need this ?
> > > 
> > > Without it I think bootm fails to build with FDT enabled.
> > 
> > looks like CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT hard depends on CONFIG_LMB, and a lot of lmb
> > stuff
> > leaks when it isn't defined.  i think i'll send a patch to tighten up the
> > lmb.h
> > header when that define isn't available.
> > -mike
> 
> OK - did you do this? Just wondering if I should drop this CONFIG now...

i posted a patch, but we'll still need the lmb define
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to