Hi Simon, Tom On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >>>> This reverts commits 2faa76196af4b3e93bcb9e38ed9090cbd3b06db3 and >>>> 498cbdfe62a8330f6c89765bdd15e60328a26511. These have introduced some >>>> large problems on all other platforms and have more changes in them than >>>> the commit message implies. >>> >>> Is it possible to revert each one by one? >> >> If that's policy, yes, I can repost as two reverts (enable i2c on >> am335x_evm, big i2c changes). > > I don't know about policy, sorry. But it might be easier for people to > see what happened.
I personally think one revert per patch so the path title is: Revert: blah Unless single reverts cause even worse breakage Regards, Graeme _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
