> From: Robert Delien <rob...@delien.nl> > > Introducing 8-bit wide register, mx28_register_8. > > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx28/regs-common.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx28/regs-common.h > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx28/regs-common.h index 75cc9a6..d2e1953 > 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx28/regs-common.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx28/regs-common.h > @@ -47,16 +47,32 @@ > * > */ > > +#define __mx28_reg_8(name) \ > + uint8_t name[4]; \ > + uint8_t name##_set[4]; \ > + uint8_t name##_clr[4]; \ > + uint8_t name##_tog[4]; \ > + > #define __mx28_reg_32(name) \ > uint32_t name; \ > uint32_t name##_set; \ > uint32_t name##_clr; \ > uint32_t name##_tog; > > +struct mx28_register_8 { > + __mx28_reg_8(reg) > +}; > + > struct mx28_register_32 { > __mx28_reg_32(reg) > }; > > +#define mx28_reg_8(name) \ > + union { \ > + struct { __mx28_reg_8(name) }; \ > + struct mx28_register_8 name##_reg; \
Will this kind of access (via register.reg) even work? I think we should replace it with register_32. > + }; > + > #define mx28_reg_32(name) \ > union { \ > struct { __mx28_reg_32(name) }; \ _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot