On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message > <ca+m6bxmkum1b39rvcj+jgdrmfcfr5stozyduvxnm4nfuz-x...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> >> > What originally has been designed to be minimal code now start to pull >> > in all kinds of other crap, that has never been designed to run before >> > relocation. >> >> Boards that don't need it can opt out. We use this internally for >> automated testing of U-Boot on hardware (and I'm setting up the same >> thing locally). > > I don't deny that it's useful. And it may even ork fine in your > specific case. > > But the approach is wrong. This code has never been meant to run > before relocation. > > I object against opening this pandora box. > > If you have so ample resources to run such code, then load a minimal > configuration of U-Boot.
Is this a change of heart then? http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/109170 -- Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
