On Monday 23 January 2012 00:27:56 Simon Glass wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:45 Simon Glass wrote: > >> This adds support for a controlling fdt, mirroring the ARM > >> implementation. > > > > OK, but what's the point if we aren't doing FDT's ? > > Aren't we?
i don't see FDT's getting used anywhere in this patch or this patch series. so no, we aren't currently doing FDT's in sandbox. > I hope that sandbox provides a way of testing the FDT > stuff. I used it for the fdtdec alias stuff which was complicated > enough that it needed unit tests. if it actually can be used/tested under sandbox, then i'm fine with this. but can that actually be done now or are other things necessary first ? > We need to enable these options to bring in that code, even if we don't > actually have a run-time FDT yet. i don't see how run-time FDT's would be used by sandbox ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
