Hi Mike, On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Saturday 14 January 2012 20:16:35 Simon Glass wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > On Thursday 12 January 2012 00:41:24 Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Still don't quite get it though. For example, the beagle board defines >> >> show_boot_progress() but does not define CONFIG_SHOW_BOOT_PROGRESS, so >> >> wouldn't that break that board? >> > >> > that sounds like an odd-man-out that needs fixing rather than allowing to >> > live >> >> Fair enough. although I suspect there will be many. If I could >> actually get a MAKEALL to run without producing 100s of broken boards >> then it would be easier to do this sort of thing. At the moment it's >> like looking for a needle in a haystack. My warnings series aimed to >> improve things slightly, but I don't think others have these problems. > > that's fair. if it's a small # of boards, i'd prefer to migrate them. if > it's a lot more, we can punt for now (add to the TODO?) and add comments to > the code why we have these checks.
OK, I don't know the answer to that but will try it out, and adjust that patch as needed. Regards, Simon > -mike _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
