I'm fairly certain... If I take the 2011.12 uBoot release the kernel takes about twice the time to boot (compared to 2011.09), and the device is noticably slower.
Then if I comment out the v7_out_cache_disable() line in cpu.c and rebuild uBoot then everything speeds up again. I thought the kernel would turn on the cache again too... Is there any easy way from userspace to determine if the cache is on? I did a bit of Googling and found: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg50083.html It may be that the kernel is re-enabling the L1 cache, but expecting L2 to be on? Or the way v7_out_cache_disable() disables L2 is not compatible with the way the kernel expects to re-enable it? Cheers, Joe -----Original Message----- From: Tom Rini <tom.r...@gmail.com> To: Joe Woodward <j...@terrafix.co.uk> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 08:11:07 -0700 Subject: Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3 performance regression in 2011.12 > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:27 AM, Joe Woodward <j...@terrafix.co.uk> wrote: > > Commit "armv7: disable L2 cache in cleanup_before_linux()" on 6th Dec > 2011 by Aneesh V adds the following: > > > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/cpu.c:cleanup_before_linux() > > > > ... > > v7_out_cache_disable(); > > ... > > > > The commit message implies this change was to make booting reliable > on OMAP4 by disabling L2 cache before jumping to Linux. > > > > However, when running with a stock 3.2 Linux kernel on an OMAP3 it > has the effect of massively reducing system performance (when running > using an OMAP3- > > only 3.2 Linux Kernel on a GUSMTIX Overo OMAP3530). > > > > Therefore, I assume this means that the kernel isn't turning the L2 > cache back on for an OMAP3 (at least with my kernel build)! > > > > So, my question is... > > > > Are there any Kconfig options in Linux that will re-enable the L2 > cache (something obvious that I've missed), or is this commit just > bad-news for OMAP3? > > Are you certain that this is the commit that's causing your problem? > The kernel is responsible for turning the cache back on and has for a > long time, iirc. > > -- > Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot