Hi, On Friday, December 9, 2011, Christian Riesch <christian.rie...@omicron.at> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch <christian.rie...@omicron.at> > Cc: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> > Cc: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paul...@ti.com> > Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> > Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar....@ti.com> > --- > board/davinci/da8xxevm/da850evm.c | 4 +- > board/davinci/da8xxevm/u-boot-spl.lds | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > doc/README.davinci | 9 +++ > include/configs/da850evm.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 board/davinci/da8xxevm/u-boot-spl.lds
Thanks for merging this into ti/next, Tom! I'd like to submit a similar patch for the da850_am18xxevm board. Before commit 06194b6b65f701a9d6ef2d9b4123c4afe57d8783 both the da850evm and the da850_am18xxevm used the same configuration, and the differences introduced in the commit are rather small. Should I submit a patch that adds the same SPL configuration to the am18xx board config? Or should we create a header file that contains the common parts and include it in both da850evm.h and da850_am18xxevm.h? Or shall we use the Options column in boards.cfg? Regards, Christian
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
