There have been a couple of unused variable cases, causing compilation
warnings when building the eNET target.
While the board/eNET/eNET.c:last_stage_init() case seems a leftover
from a quick edit, the arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c:sc520_udelay()
seems to actually require accessing the registers discarding the
values.
The source code is being modified accordingly.
TEST:
- the eNET target now builds cleanly
- examining disassembled sc520_timer.o shows that the registers are
still being accessed in the beginning of the function.
Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vben...@chromium.org>
---
[Resend with the proper cc: header]
arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c | 1 +
board/eNET/eNET.c | 5 -----
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c b/arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c
index 495a694..a7bbe92 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/sc520/sc520_timer.c
@@ -87,4 +87,5 @@ void sc520_udelay(unsigned long usec)
m += readw(&sc520_mmcr->swtmrmilli);
u = readw(&sc520_mmcr->swtmrmicro) + (m * 1000);
} while (u < usec);
+ (void) temp;
}
diff --git a/board/eNET/eNET.c b/board/eNET/eNET.c
index 429fe1b..2f26470 100644
--- a/board/eNET/eNET.c
+++ b/board/eNET/eNET.c
@@ -178,11 +178,6 @@ void show_boot_progress(int val)
int last_stage_init(void)
{
- int minor;
- int major;
-
- major = minor = 0;
-
outb(0x00, LED_LATCH_ADDRESS);
register_timer_isr(enet_timer_isr);
--
1.7.3.1
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
