Hi Tom, Thanks for your comments. On Friday, December 2, 2011, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > On 12/02/2011 09:12 AM, Christian Riesch wrote: > > [snip] >> include/configs/da850evm.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > [snip] >> +#define CONFIG_SYS_DA850_DDR2_SDTIMR (0 | \ >> + (14 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_RFC_SHIFT) | \ >> + (2 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_RP_SHIFT) | \ >> + (2 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_RCD_SHIFT) | \ >> + (1 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_WR_SHIFT) | \ >> + (5 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_RAS_SHIFT) | \ >> + (8 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_RC_SHIFT) | \ >> + (1 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_RRD_SHIFT) | \ >> + (0 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_WTR_SHIFT)) > > '0 | ..' and '0 << ...' don't help readability over just value saying it > (same with shifting 0). Also, unless the manual these come from uses > decimal here, hex is preferred. Thanks! >
'0 | ...'. I agree, I'll remove this. '0 << ...' Aaaahhh... Yes, that's pretty useless here, the WTR bits are reserved bits :-/ Decimal values: I'd like to keep them. This is DDR timing, the numbers mean number of clock cycles minus one. So actually (1 << DV_DDR_SDTMR1_RRD_SHIFT) means that trrd=13.3333... ns (two clock cycles) at 150 MHz. So I must calculate with these numbers and this is why I prefer decimal over hex. I am lazy ;-) Christian > -- > Tom > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot >
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot