On Tuesday 29 November 2011 15:04:04 Simon Glass wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2011 11:55:17 Simon Glass wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > Simon: did we decide to start a dedicated sandbox repo ?
> >> 
> >> We didn't decide - it was an idea and I suppose given Wolfgang's email
> >> about workload and the early and patch-needy state of sandbox I
> >> suspect we should do this. The other option is perhaps for an existing
> >> maintainer to collect things to push into staging (if there is such a
> >> maintainer interested in sandbox).
> >> 
> >> Wolfgang, do you want a sandbox repo?
> > 
> > well, one of these two things is going to happen :).  i'd prefer a
> > dedicated repo, otherwise i'll start using a branch for it in an
> > existing repo.
> 
> OK - who can maintain it? Preferably not someone who will be doing a
> lot of sandbox patches I suppose so that rules me out :-)

you or me or both.  i'm fine with any of those three options.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to