On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Jason Hui, > > In message > <CAFQ4atRGwSxiw+mik8wSMMUVW4M=n9ws55ppd1ifhu-e1aj...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> >> I'm just get confused. It seems from you that we can both use: >> CONFIG_option and CONFIG_SYS_ in this patch? right? > > It's one of those boarder cases. But given that we don't actually set > hardware related values (say, initial data for registers) here, but > select from a set of pre-defined options (UART1_BASE etc.) it seems OK > to me to handle this as Stefano suggested, i. e. as > CONFIG_MXC_UART_BASE .
OK, thanks Wolfgang. > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > -- > DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel > HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany > Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de > You Don't Have To Be 'Damned' To Work Here, But It Helps!!! > - Terry Pratchett, _Eric_ > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
