>> +
>> + if (name[0])
>> + return (-EINVAL);
>
> Why the parenthesis ?
Because you asked for them… But OK, I'll remove them again...
>> +
>> + return ( ((bank << MXS_PAD_BANK_SHIFT) & MXS_PAD_BANK_MASK) |
>> + ((pin << MXS_PAD_PIN_SHIFT ) & MXS_PAD_PIN_MASK ) );
>> +}
>> +
>> int gpio_invalid(int gp)
>> {
>> if ( (gp & ~(MXS_PAD_BANK_MASK | MXS_PAD_PIN_MASK)) ||
>
> This was there before or are we missing some previous commit here ?
To apply cleanly, this patch needs the pin validity patch applied first.
However, it will apply without it, yet not cleanly.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
