On Sunday 20 November 2011 00:08:05 Simon Glass wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Friday 18 November 2011 12:20:02 Stefano Babic wrote: > >> On 11/05/2011 03:25 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > This corects the warning below, obtained with my gcc 4.6 compiler. > >> > > >> > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/libmx5.o: In function `decode_pll': > >> > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/clock.c:94: undefined reference to > >> > `__aeabi_uldivmod' > >> > >> I do not see the issue you reported. > > > > are you using PRIVATE LIBGCC ? > > Yes, perhaps as a side-effect of the buildall script...
by design. some arm boards want big endian, some want little. using private allows using of just one gcc. > Since a recent ARM patch to support widen divide was rejected, I > assume that we should use do_div() in these cases? yes, as it involves a 64bit in the division. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
