On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Detlev Zundel <d...@denx.de> wrote: > Hi Stefano, > >> On 11/16/2011 07:51 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> >> Wolfgang, >> >>>> >>>> Please let's try if this works. If you have any suggestions how to >>>> help better, please don't hesitate to tell us. >> >> I have tried with a couple of patches (network related), and then I >> wanted to test if push works. As u-boot-staging should be open for all >> custodians, I was expecting I should use the same mechanism, and then I >> tried with: >> >> >> git push ssh://gu-...@git.denx.de/u-boot-staging sba...@denx.de >> >> ...but the new branch sba...@denx.de is now part of u-boot-imx, not >> u-boot-staging ! Where is the mistake ? > > Indeed - this is because of the setup of the custodian trees. The git > action is directly coupled to the user account so the account gu-imx > will _only_ be able to work inside that tree. Effectively, the > directory part of the URL is discarded... > > The correct usage is of course as Wolfgang points out through the > gu-staging user. >
Might I humbly suggest that the custodians just push changes to a separate branch in their own trees? It should be effectively the same, but without everyone possibly hitting the same repository at the same time... Andy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot