On Tuesday 08 November 2011 18:14:46 Graeme Russ wrote: > Ah, yes you have - Can you give me a list? I think to be pragmatic we > should either wrap the all or go down the private libgcc path like ARM has > done. Private lib functions would elliminate the overhead, but is this > really such a problem anyway?
it then becomes a sync issue ... updates to gcc's libgcc aren't reflected in u- boot automatically ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
