On Tuesday 08 November 2011 18:14:46 Graeme Russ wrote:
> Ah, yes you have - Can you give me a list? I think to be pragmatic we
> should either wrap the all or go down the private libgcc path like ARM has
> done. Private lib functions would elliminate the overhead, but is this
> really such a problem anyway?

it then becomes a sync issue ... updates to gcc's libgcc aren't reflected in u-
boot automatically ...
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to