Hi Wolfgang, On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Simon, > > I just ran over this old posting again: > > 09/10/2008 Ricardo Ribalda D [PATCH] I2C EEPROM simulator v2 > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/46964 > > We never accepted this for U-Boot mainline, but in the context of the > Sandbox environment it might be interesting again. > > What do you think?
Yes I think it is interesting. Both Mike and I have done a SPI EEPROM implementation which is file-backed, whereas this has CONFIG-defined data. With this sort of thing it probably needs a 'user' who wants it for a particular purpose and implements it to fit their needs, rather than us bringing in things for their own sake. Regards, Simon > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > -- > DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel > HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany > Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de > I often quote myself; it adds spice to my conversation. - G. B. Shaw > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
