Dear Simon Glass, In message <CAPnjgZ2wW3tvGjxWgkVr0PHLr2Ttj8abtPc4aiyk=tgnpss...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > I have suggested making these functions available by default, and > having CONFIG_NO_SYS_VSNPRINT to remove them. The rationale is that it
This makes little sense to me. We don't need an opt out here, but an opt in instead. Otherwise you willprobably see a number of builds breaking due to the increased code size. > There is therefore a code size increase by default with this series. > We can instead use CONFIG_SYS_VSNPRINT if people think it is safe. Which boards were build tested with these patches applied? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Sex is like air. It's only a big deal if you can't get any. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
