On 11/01/2011 02:49 AM, Christian Hitz wrote: > Am 31.10.2011 21:15, schrieb Scott Wood: >> On 10/31/2011 07:22 AM, Christian Hitz wrote: >>> Am 29.10.2011 00:30, schrieb Scott Wood: >>>> On 10/12/2011 02:32 AM, Christian Hitz wrote: >>>>> [backport from linux commit 02f8c6aee8df3cdc935e9bdd4f2d020306035dbe] >>>>> >>>>> This patch synchronizes the nand driver with the Linux 3.0 state. >>>>> >>>>> Adds 1416 bytes to the image size. >>>> >>>> What does this version of the code do that warrants the code size >>>> increase? This could break some SPLs. >>>> >>>> If it's just a speed issue, we probably want to stick with the current >>>> code. >>> >>> It's the rewrite for performance and support for 512 byte pages, but this is >>> on the basis of the rewritten code. >> >> Several SPLs make use of nand_ecc.c, so NACK replacing it with a larger >> implementation. > > So, should I resubmit the patch series without this part?
Not if the current patchset works with this one dropped. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
