Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201110250211.07058.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > I know this very well, I just need to feedback and the patchset is really > huge.
What you attempt will not work. You may get some feedback on patches posted on the list. I will_never_ send any feedback to any stuff in some repository anywhere. I will never even try to read it. And I m pretty sure many others work like that, too. If the patch set is huge, then do yourself a favour and break it down into small, managable pieces. Don't try to do everything at once. Send a short sub-set first - maybe some 4...8 patches or so. Maybe even 10. Then let people digest these, and only when they are scheduled for merging start and post the next of your batches. _Nobody_ will review a 50 patch series. And nobdy will apply it either. > I'd wait for you to merge some of the stuff from this patchset (you can merge > what you feel fitting but the 0001 patch ...) and then rebase and resubmit > the > rest on top of that. I'd rather you split the series in smaller, digestable batches. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Severe culture shock results when experts from another protocol suite [...] try to read OSI documents. The term "osified" is used to refer to such documents. [...] Any relationship to the word "ossified" is purely intentional. - Marshall T. Rose _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
