Hi Albert, On 22.10.2011 02:31, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > Le 18/10/2011 17:55, Vladimir Zapolskiy a écrit : >> This change adds initial support for NXP LPC32x0 SoC series. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy<v...@mleia.com> >> --- >> Changes from v2 to v3: >> * checkpatch.pl reports zero errors and warnings >> >> Changes from v1 to v2: >> * BIT(n) and SBF(s, v) macro are not used anymore >> * removed NS16550 and 14-clock UART definitions from uart.h >> * added devices.c file, which contains standard UART preinitialization >> routine >> * added get_serial_clock() function, it returns actual frequency of >> UART clock >> * __udelay() realization is simplified, no need of interrupt handling > > As it stands, this is dead code until some board uses it; I imagine you > have board waiting for this support. Can you submit the SoC and board > code as a patch set? This way, it will be obvious for all that the SoC > code in this patch has actual use.
you're right, I have a board to make support for. However I presume that U-boot maintainers won't be happy to include a board with CONFIG_ENV_IS_NOWHERE, and unfortunately flash driver isn't yet ready for publishing. I'd like to get an advice, if you think that weakly supported but working U-boot on the board has chances to be included to arm-next I can send the patchset right now for review, otherwise I'll spend some time (one week approximately) to finish NAND driver. -- With best wishes, Vladimir _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
