Hi Jason, Le 29/09/2011 22:05, Jason a écrit : > Albert, Prafulla, > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:42:42AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On 21/09/2011 23:34, Jason wrote: >>> Albert, Prafulla, >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>> In message<20110920215703.gb7...@titan.lakedaemon.net> you wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:17:34PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>>>> Hello everybody, >>>>>> >>>>>> are we ready for a -rc2 (so we don;t have to shift the release date >>>>>> any further), or are there any important fixes still missing? >>>>> >>>>> Not a bugfix, but since it had been originally submitted before the >>>>> merge window, you had mentioned it might be possible [1] to get it in: >>>>> >>>>> [PATCH v8] dreamplug: initial board support. >>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/115270/ >>>>> >>>>> The main reason for the lateness was hammering out how to use a >>>>> MACH_TYPE_XXX that isn't in mainline Linux yet. We didn't get it >>>>> settled until 18 Sept. [2]. Otherwise, it would've been in sooner... >>>>> >>>>> Please? :-) >>>> >>>> It is up to the respective custodians in the chain (Prafulla, Albert) >>>> to apply and send pull requests. >>> >>> Any hope of making 2011.09? >>> >>> thx, >>> >>> Jason. >> >> Pinging this up for my information: this does not appear to be in >> u-boot-marvell ATM. >> >> Prafulla, do you intend to pick this up? If not, then I can pick it >> up directly in u-boot-arm today (or Wolfgang can pick it up if he >> prefers). > > Looks like it didn't make it. So, I've rebased it against v2011.09 and > did a quick test. There's really no significant changes. Should I roll > a v9 for the rebase? I'm inclined to think it's unnecessary... > > thx, > > Jason.
It still applies cleanly onto the current u-boot-arm/master. Prafulla, do you mind if I take it? Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot