On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tuesday 11 October 2011 21:41:19 Joe Hershberger wrote: >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/.checkpatch.conf >> >> +# Not Linux, so don't expect a Linux tree. >> +--no-tree
Why depend on or have to specify where a linux tree is for building u-boot? > the only things checkpatch.pl uses $tree for, i think we want. like #include > asm/foo.h instead of linux/foo.h. why do you want this ? > >> +# For Linux includes >> +--ignore ARCH_INCLUDE_LINUX >> +--ignore INCLUDE_LINUX > > i think these checks are good actually. we import headers from Linux all the > time ... These seem to be irrelevant if --no-tree is specified. It doesn't seem like checkpatch would make good decisions about this anyway given that an include file that exists in the referred-to Linux tree may not exist in the u-boot tree. -Joe _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
