On Monday 10 October 2011 13:53:48 Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: > > New default, weak i2c_set_bus_num() function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> > > Cc: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> > > I would prefer to see a new set of I2C functions that take a bus > number as a parameter, so that we can eliminate i2c_set_bus_num() (and > the global variable it modifies) altogether.
i think that'd require a much larger rework of the framework and thus would be better to do in addition to Stefano's work rather than in place of ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot