On Monday 10 October 2011 13:53:48 Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote:
> > New default, weak i2c_set_bus_num() function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de>
> > Cc: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de>
> 
> I would prefer to see a new set of I2C functions that take a bus
> number as a parameter, so that we can eliminate i2c_set_bus_num() (and
> the global variable it modifies) altogether.

i think that'd require a much larger rework of the framework and thus would be 
better to do in addition to Stefano's work rather than in place of ?
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to