On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 03:59:19 In-Bae Jeong wrote:
> - if (!gpio_request(171, "") &&
> - !gpio_request(172, "") &&
> - !gpio_request(173, "")) {
> + if (gpio_request(171, "")) {
> + error = 171;
> + goto GPIO_171_ERR;
> + }
> + if (gpio_request(172, "")) {
> + error = 172;
> + goto GPIO_172_ERR;
> + }
> + if (gpio_request(173, "")) {
> + error = 173;
> + goto GPIO_173_ERR;
> + }why isn't this code passing a proper label to gpio_request() ? > +GPIO_NO_ERR: gpio_free(173); > +GPIO_173_ERR: gpio_free(172); > +GPIO_172_ERR: gpio_free(171); > +GPIO_171_ERR: labels and statements should not be on the same line also, lose the caps -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
