On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 01:57:52 PM Nick Thompson wrote:
> On 27/09/11 11:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:31:15 AM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> Dear Marek Vasut,
> >> 
> >> In message <1317062895-3847-1-git-send-email-marek.va...@gmail.com> you 
wrote:
> >>> The size of uboot binary grows by a few bytes, but the gain (better
> >>> type checking) is worth it.
> >> 
> >> And what _exactly_ are "a few bytes" ?
> > 
> > Nevermind, it must have been some kind of a fluctuation yesterday. Right
> > now, I made a new measurement and the size didn't change with/without
> > the patch (this is more what I'd expect to happen).
> > 
> > Cheers
> 
> Pure speculation on my part, but /could/ this be because ARM drivers don't
> tend to use these macros/functions. write[bwl] and the like are much more
> common. I don't know this to be a fact though.

No, I'm dead sure I use this macro in the test.

> 
> Nick.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to