On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 01:57:52 PM Nick Thompson wrote: > On 27/09/11 11:21, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 11:31:15 AM Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Dear Marek Vasut, > >> > >> In message <1317062895-3847-1-git-send-email-marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > >>> The size of uboot binary grows by a few bytes, but the gain (better > >>> type checking) is worth it. > >> > >> And what _exactly_ are "a few bytes" ? > > > > Nevermind, it must have been some kind of a fluctuation yesterday. Right > > now, I made a new measurement and the size didn't change with/without > > the patch (this is more what I'd expect to happen). > > > > Cheers > > Pure speculation on my part, but /could/ this be because ARM drivers don't > tend to use these macros/functions. write[bwl] and the like are much more > common. I don't know this to be a fact though.
No, I'm dead sure I use this macro in the test. > > Nick. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
