On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 01:38:46 PM Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > (splitting this discussion between the patch and my longer term RFC, > here I follow the patch, keeping the subject line unchanged) > > Le 06/09/2011 08:40, Marek Vasut a écrit : > > This is completely out of scope for this patch. My proposal would be to > > merge this, then start mucking with this moving files around. > > Agreed. My proposal was more of a longer term RFC) > > > I'll have to think about it, but there is my proposal above. Please > > consider it, it'll help while dodging the trouble for a while until this > > is settled. > > If you mean 'have arm-generic weak defaults in arch/arm and arm926ejs > implementation in arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs', I'm ok with that.
Yes please. > > Amicalement, Cheers _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
