> -----Original Message----- > From: Luca Ceresoli [mailto:luca.ceres...@comelit.it] > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 10:19 PM > To: Premi, Sanjeev > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Paulraj, Sandeep; Igor Grinberg; > Enric Balletbo i Serra; Sunil Kumar; Shashi Ranjan; Menon, > Nishanth; Steve Sakoman > Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] omap: gpio: User generic (instead of > custom) API > > Hi Sanjeev, > > Sanjeev Premi wrote: > > The OMAP boards use a custom api for GPIO operations. While > > it works, it doesn't help when when we don't know existence > > of the customization. > > > > I earlier encountered the problem when looking for GPIO > > related changes when submitting prev set of patches. Since > > the search for gpio_request() in omap sources returned empty, > > I had assumed that it isn't supported. > > > > This patchset attempts to adapt the current implementation > > to use generic API. > > > > Since, the changes impact all OMAP boards, and I wouldn't be > > able to test on all, I decided to submit changes as RFC. > > Unless any major issue is found, I will be able to submit > > as formal patch by end of this week. > > Tested and working on the dig297 board, on top of the master > branch in the u-boot-ti repository. > > I also tried to merge your work on the u-boot-arm repo, but it > conflicts with the GPIO work recently committed there. You might > want to rebase and resubmit when the -ti repo will be in line with > the -arm one.
Thanks. I didn't check the -arm repo; had based all patches on the master @ git.denx.de/u-boot.git - assuming there won't been too many changes since recent pull requests. ~sanjeev (PS: Had to trim the cc: list to ensure message gets through...) > Anyway, for the current version: > Tested-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceres...@comelit.it> > > Luca > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
