On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 05:27:46 PM Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 11:11:00 Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 04:32:52 PM Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 06:38:50 Che-Liang Chiou wrote: > > > > This patch adds a 64-64 bit divider that supports ARMv4 and above. > > > > > > why ? if you're doing 64 bit divides, chances are you're doing > > > something fundamentally wrong. perhaps you should fix that instead. > > > > Oh come on Mike, what about too big NAND memories ? > > Linux hasnt had a problem supporting large NAND without a 64bit divide > routine. why are we special ?
Because someone (?) has to fix the code that uses do_div() ;-) > > > > this is also why we have the do_div() helper macro. > > > > > > so until your changelog documents the actual *reason* for this patch: > > > NAK > > > > The reason is likely it's faster. > > let's see actual #'s True, will you make the measurements? ;-) Still, I'd stick with the plain-C version, it doesn't matter I guess. Cheers > -mike _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot