Nagabhushana, On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Netagunte, Nagabhushana <nagabhushana.netagu...@ti.com> wrote: > > Gentlemen, > > We will address cache coherency issues soon after these patches.
Ok -- that's great news; we greatly anticipate U-boot improvements for da850 from TI. > Earlier also, chache was disabled. Only due to new cache management > Framework which was added recently, it is explicitly needed to be > Indicated to turn off cache. My experience with the ARM-relocation changes on da8xx (which enabled caches as I understood it) was very positive. I'm sorry I missed the patch that disabled cache for davinci; git log --decorate u-boot/master -- board/davinci/ arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/ include/configs/davinci_* arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci doesn't turn up anything related to caches so the patch (re: 'Earlier also, chache was disabled') is still in mailing lists? > Since fixing the cache coherency issues with EMAC will take some time, > I want this patch to go in mainline so that issue doesn't crop up for > People who use u-boot. I certainly don't want anything less than the best user experience for da850 u-boot. It's possible that I have not been using caches in u-boot as I thought I was -- considering I did not experience corrupted frames from the EMAC. On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Netagunte, Nagabhushana <nagabhushana.netagu...@ti.com> wrote: > If you have no further comments, can you please ACK patches? for what it's worth: Acked-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardi...@nanometrics.ca> Best Regards, Ben Gardiner --- Nanometrics Inc. +1 (613) 592-6776 x239 http://www.nanometrics.ca _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
