Le 30/08/2011 21:08, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4e5d088b.7090...@aribaud.net> you wrote: >> >> I have just applied Wolfgang's updated ARM board removal patch set. >> >> Currently, u-boot-arm/master builds 182 boards, of which: >> >> - ELDK4.2 finds 37 boards with warnings or errors ( dnp1110 gcplus lart > > I think we should try and separate the errors cases from the warnings > only ones - those boards with build errors need to be fixed, or > removed.
Right, but the current MAKEALL output does not make it easy to sort this out. Maybe we could change MAKEALL to distinguish between error and warning counts (and produce LOG/*.MAKELOG, LOG/*.ERR and LOG/*.WARN accordingly). > We can clean up warnings then, as we go on. Agreed. However, I'd prefer it if no ARM board produced any warning -- granted, here it *looks like* many of these warnings are inocuous, and any new toolchain might produce some more, but if we don't keep the warning count at zero, then a less inocuous warning could creep in unnoticed. >> - CodeSourcery 2010q1 finds 100 (!) boards with warnings or errors ( > > I guess it's additional warnings. You will see even more when using > ELDK 5.x > >> (Cc:ing Rémy for USB stuff; for yaffs, I don't know whom I should Cc:) > > yeaffs is generic code, i. e. it ends up on my plate. There you are, then. :) >> For both CS and ELDK, there are a lot of "arm-linux-ld: stubs.o: >> compiled for a big endian system and target is little endian >> arm-linux-ld: failed to merge target specific data of file stubs.o" >> which I'll look into. > > You need a big endian ARM compiler for the ixp systems. Got it -- actually, it is not a compiler issue, but a library issue: CS does compile for big-endian as well as little-endian, but does not provide big-endian libs (<http://www.codesourcery.com/sgpp/lite/arm/portal/kbentry36>, at least as I understand it). Apparently ELDK4.2 does not either. Would ELDK5.0 have them? I haven't gotten around to setting it up. >> Meanwhile, I suggest that the current u-boot-arm/master be considered >> rc1-ready, with the effort until rc2 focused on finding and fixing >> code-wide bugs such as those two above. > > Agreed. > >> If that is ok, I'll send out a pull request today. > > Thanks a lot! Done, with a few hour's delay. > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
