On 08/18/11 00:58, Eric Jarrige wrote: > Hi Higor, Hi Stefano, > > On 17 août 2011, at 09:31, Igor Grinberg wrote: > >> On 08/12/11 09:49, Stefano Babic wrote: >>> On 08/12/2011 01:41 AM, Eric Jarrige wrote: >>> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>>>>> +int board_init(void) +{ + gd->bd->bi_arch_number = >>>>>> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE; >>>>> Is there no MACH_TYPE for this board ? It is uncommon for an ARM >>>>> board. Should this board run Linux ? >>>> The MACH_TYPE for this board is 906. This board runs linux and the >>>> integration in linux is on going. >>> Ok, I have understood. The only thing you can directly set >>> MACH_TYPE_APF9328 here. IMHO it is more readable. >> You should not do this here unless you support multiple mach types in a >> single file. >> Please, see the CONFIG_MACH_TYPE in the U-Boot documentation (README file). > Here is the README sentence regarding CONFIG_MACH_TYPE: > >> CONFIG_MACH_TYPE [relevant for ARM only][mandatory] >> >> This setting is mandatory for all boards that have only one >> machine type and must be used to specify the machine type >> number as it appears in the ARM machine registry >> (see http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/). >> Only boards that have multiple machine types supported >> in a single configuration file and the machine type is >> runtime discoverable, do not have to use this setting. > My understanding is: > 1) CONFIG_MACH_TYPE has to be defined in apf9328.h > 2) as gd->bd->bi_arch_number is already initialize in board.c i should > completely remove this second initialization from the apf9382.c
Right. Just remove that line. -- Regards, Igor. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot