On Monday, August 15, 2011 05:09:42 Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> On 08/14/2011 09:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 08:37:00 Valentin Longchamp wrote:
> >> --- a/include/post.h
> >> +++ b/include/post.h
> >> 
> >> +/*
> >> + * some ARM implementations have to use gd->ram_size, since POST_WORD
> >> is + * defined in RAM
> >> + */
> >> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
> > 
> > i'm not sure about this.  no other header has been allowed to do this in
> > the past, and i dont think we should start now.
> 
> OK. Then we should move the post_word_load and post_word_store function to
> post/post.c. Would this be accepted ?

that would add overhead that most people dont need.  i guess the only other 
option would be to add a CONFIG_POST_EXTERNAL_WORD_FUNCS and then post.h would 
just define the two funcs as externs.  it'd be up to the board porters to 
define them however they want.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to