On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Schmidt <ste...@datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
> > Given these different use cases I never seen fastboot and DFU as > competitors. Personally I see DFU as a good and standardized way of > _flashing_ devices while fastboot/novacom are way to communicate with > the bootloader (allow flashing as on task). > Just my two cents. From my discussions with Android developers, they use fastboot as a quick turnaround way of getting an image on a board during iterative development. The other thing I think is important is the ability to choose DFU or fastboot at run time vs compile time. So we should be able to have both features turned on in a given u-boot binary. This means of course that fastboot, or DFU would not assume it owned the gadget USB HW. --John _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
