Hello.
On 08-08-2011 17:57, Yao Cheng wrote:
> The issue is found when calling flush_cache() with zero "size" argument.
> The bound of loop is miscalculated in this case and flush_cache() enters a
> wrong flushing loop.
> To fix this issue I skipped the operations when "size" is found to be zero.
> Signed-off-by: Yao Cheng<saturdayco...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Shinya Kuribayashi<skuri...@pobox.com>
> ---
> Changes for v2:
> - Coding style cleanup
> - Move code after declarations to avoid warning
> arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c
> index 3ae397c..8fa53ba 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cpu.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,11 @@ void flush_cache(ulong start_addr, ulong size)
> unsigned long addr = start_addr& ~(lsize - 1);
> unsigned long aend = (start_addr + size - 1)& ~(lsize - 1);
>
> + /* aend will be miscalculated when size is zero, so we return here */
> + if (size == 0) {
> + return;
> + }
{} not needed here.
WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
