Hello Lothar and Mattijs,

I hope web outlook doesn't render my response unreadable.
________________________________________
From: Mattijs Korpershoek <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2026 17:15
To: Lothar Waßmann; [email protected]
Cc: Petr Beneš
Subject: Re: Regression in f_fastboot due to commit 6a92e9827650 ("usb: ci_udc: 
Check ci_ep->desc before use")

Hi Lothar,

On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 07:12, Lothar Waßmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> commit 6a92e9827650 ("usb: ci_udc: Check ci_ep->desc before use") has
> the side effect that an empty buffer is being passed on to
> rx_handler_command() in drivers/usb/gadget/f_fastboot.c upon
> termination of a fastboot session which leads to a
> 'command  not recognized' error message being printed on the console.

Thank you for reporting this.

>
> Obviously without the commit the offending USB request had been silently
> dropped but is now delivered to the upper levels.

Well, it was not silently dropped in case of the ethernet gadget, it was 
silently corrupting memory.

>
> I'm not sure what the correct fix would be.
> Should the fastboot driver ignore the empty command buffer or should
> the "Moreover, the patch gets rid of possible outstanding requests
> if the endpoint's state changes to disabled." part of the commit be
> reverted?

Hmm, maybe I got it wrong. The endpoint got disabled, so what should happen 
with requests?

linux/usb/gadget.h reads:

 * @complete: Function called when request completes, so this request and
 *      its buffer may be re-used.
 *      Reads terminate with a short packet, or when the buffer fills,
 *      whichever comes first.  When writes terminate, some data bytes
 *      will usually still be in flight (often in a hardware fifo).
 *      Errors (for reads or writes) stop the queue from advancing
 *      until the completion function returns, so that any transfers
 *      invalidated by the error may first be dequeued.

Petr, did you observe similar behaviour with the ums gadget?

I didn't see any wrongdoing of the ethernet gadget.
>
>
> Lothar Waßmann

Regards,
Petr

Reply via email to