Hi Matthias, Le 01/08/2011 20:16, Matthias Weisser a écrit : > Dear Albert > > Am 01.08.2011 17:11, schrieb Matthias Weisser: >> auto gen asm-offsets.h for mb86r0x >> >> Signed-off-by: Matthias Weisser<weiss...@arcor.de> >> --- >> Changes in v2: >> - Added forgotten register structures >> >> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mb86r0x/Makefile | 2 + >> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mb86r0x/asm-offsets.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mb86r0x/asm-offsets.h | 74 >> ----------------------- >> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mb86r0x/mb86r0x.h | 42 +++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mb86r0x/asm-offsets.c >> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mb86r0x/asm-offsets.h > > Would you please consider this patch for inclusion. Currently jadecpu is > broken since [f456445f29d22bb31ad29fdf1d6b2769decd37a2]. It is not clear > to me why the referenced patch breaks jadecpu (must be some make > dependency stuff) but it slipped through my testing as I had applied the > above patch in an earlier version when submitting the patch which breaks it. > > This patch fixes jadecpu and also gets rid of the hand written > asm-offsets.h. > > I can't test it (no powerpc toolchain at hand) but the above mentioned > commit may also break mpc512x based boards. If that is the case > ./arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc512x/asm-offsets.h should also be autogenerated. > If this is done we will not have any non-autogenerated asm-offsets.h in > u-boot anymore.
Wolfgang, can you test on powerpc? > Regards, > Matthias Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
