+ Emanuele On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 09:17:47AM +0800, [email protected] wrote: > From: Ye Li <[email protected]> > > After supporting get DRAM size from SM, the trampoline buffer address > still depends on PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE. If the real DDR size is less than > PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE, the trampoline buffer address is invalid and SPL will > crash. So use board_phys_sdram_size to get real DDR size to calculate > correct address. > > Fixes: e1cc7117b630 ("imx9: scmi: Get DDR size through SM SCMI API") > Signed-off-by: Ye Li <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/scmi/soc.c | 16 +++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/scmi/soc.c > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/scmi/soc.c > index 00b8693fbe0..ce86cdf8574 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/scmi/soc.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx9/scmi/soc.c > @@ -1177,10 +1177,11 @@ enum boot_device get_boot_device(void) > > bool arch_check_dst_in_secure(void *start, ulong size) > { > - ulong ns_end = CFG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE + PHYS_SDRAM_SIZE; > -#ifdef PHYS_SDRAM_2_SIZE > - ns_end += PHYS_SDRAM_2_SIZE; > -#endif > + ulong ns_end; > + phys_size_t dram_size; > + > + board_phys_sdram_size(&dram_size);
Emanuele: does this change has any impact on the memory size detection we have implemented in our i.MX95 based boards? Peng: board_phys_sdram_size() in board/toradex/verdin-imx95/verdin-imx95.c Francesco
